Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Björk remixography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Sean Whitton / 11:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Björk remixography

Non-notable remixes. All information is forked from respective singles. Fancruft. Remixes are interpretations of other musicians work. If a remix has been released, then a remix should be discussed on the release article. This feels like indiscriminate information. Also fails WP:NEO for the use of remixography. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 15:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 15:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Merge into discography if you have to. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or complete merge as this is not an unreasonable level of detail for as highly notable an artist as Björk, in whose work the medium of the remix is prominent.Skomorokh 13:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge. Preferably the former, as a merge would make the dicography much less readable. Otherwise it needs citing, as some of these are not remixes (ie Brodsky quartet version of Hyperballad is a complete re-recording with different vocals and instruments - no remixer made this).Yobmod (talk) 09:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.